ARMSTRONG v. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COM'N

No. 93-3077.

12 F.3d 401 (1993)

Martin A. ARMSTRONG, Petitioner, v. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Decided December 21, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher Lovell (argued), Christopher Lovell, P.C., New York City, for petitioner.

Pat G. Nicolette, Acting Gen. Counsel, Jay L. Witkin, Deputy Gen. Counsel, James T. Kelly, Asst. Gen. Counsel (argued) and Gracemary Rizzo, Atty., Commodity Futures Trading Com'n, Washington, DC, for respondent.

Before: GREENBERG, COWEN and SEITZ, Circuit Judges.


OPINION OF THE COURT

SEITZ, Circuit Judge.

Martin A. Armstrong petitions for review of a decision of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the "Commission") holding him individually responsible as a controlling person of corporations found to have violated Commission regulations. This court has jurisdiction to review orders issued by the Commission under 7 U.S.C. § 9 (Supp. IV 1992).

I. Background

At age 13, Martin Armstrong began...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases