1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 5 F.3d
  5. 5 F.3d 407 (1993)
 

U.S. v. NORTHROP CORP.

No. 92-55092.

5 F.3d 407 (1993)

UNITED STATES of America, ex rel., Plaintiff, and Leocadio Barajas, and Patricia Meyer, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NORTHROP CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided September 20, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald C. Stock, Law Offices of Herbert Hafif, Claremont, CA, for plaintiff-appellant.

John T. Boese, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, Washington, DC, for defendant-appellee.

Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER, and FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

JAMES R. BROWNING, Circuit Judge:

The question is whether the district court has jurisdiction under the False Claims Act (the Act), 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq., over claims a qui tam plaintiff added to his complaint by amendment based on information disclosed by the United States in a criminal indictment returned after the plaintiff filed the original complaint.

I.

Boeing Corporation selected Northrop Corporation to produce flight data transmitters...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases