MILLER v. KIRSHNER

(14438), (14439)

225 Conn. 185 (1993)

MARY MILLER v. HAL KIRSHNER

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decision released March 23, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alexander H. Schwartz, with whom were Richard G. Kent and, on the brief, Michael F. Ewing, for the appellant in the first case, appellee in the second case (defendant).

Helen Z. Pearl, with whom was John Serrano, for the appellee in the first case, appellant in the second case (plaintiff).

PETERS, C. J., CALLAHAN, BERDON, NORCOTT and KATZ, JS.


NORCOTT, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the trial court, Hon. Joseph F. Morelli, state trial referee, finding the defendant, Hal Kirshner, to be the father of the child of the plaintiff, Mary Miller, and ordering the defendant to pay a support arrearage, weekly child support until the child's eighteenth birthday and attorney's fees. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly: (1) admitted the results of a human leukocyte antigen (HLA) test...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases