GAJEWSKI v. PAVELO

(11404)

32 Conn. App. 373 (1993)

MARIA GAJEWSKI ET AL. v. ARTHUR PAVELO ET AL.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decision released August 10, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard A. Fuchs, with whom, on the brief, was Rosalind J. Koskoff, for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Barbara Brazzel-Massaro, associate city attorney, for the appellees (defendant city of Bridgeport et al.).

James E. Coyne, for the appellee (defendant Utica Radiator Corporation).

DUPONT, C. J., DALY and LAVERY, JS.


DUPONT, C. J.

The plaintiffs, Maria Gajewski, Jan Gajewski and Janusz Gajewski, appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants rendered after a jury verdict. The plaintiffs claim that (1) the jury charge was so confusing that it provided inadequate guidance to the jury, (2) the jury charge included inconsistent instructions, and (3) the court improperly instructed the jury on the duty to warn under the provisions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases