CUYAHOGA VALLEY RY. CO. v. TRACY

Nos. 92-3557, 92-3558.

6 F.3d 389 (1993)

CUYAHOGA VALLEY RAILWAY COMPANY; The Mahoning Valley Railway Company; The River Terminal Railway Company, Plaintiffs-Appellees, Norfolk and Western Railway Company; CSX Transportation; Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railroad Company; Consolidated Rail Corporation; Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company; Wheeling & Lake Erie Railway Company, Intervenors-Appellees, v. Roger W. TRACY, Ohio Tax Commissioner, Defendant-Appellant (92-3557), Defendant (92-3558), Mary E. Withrow, Ohio Treasurer, Defendant (92-3557), Defendant-Appellant (92-3558).

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided September 28, 1993.

Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing Denied November 30, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David W. Alexander (briefed), Philomena M. Dane (argued), Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, Columbus, OH, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Kathleen M. Trafford (argued and briefed), Patrick Jerome Smith, Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, Columbus, OH, Everett Gibson, Memphis, TN, Aaron P. Rosenfeld (briefed), Raymond D. Anderson, Eric A. Pierce, Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, Columbus, OH, for intervenors-appellees.

James C. Sauer, Asst. Atty. Gen. (argued and briefed), Office of the Atty. Gen. of Ohio, Columbus, OH, for defendant-appellant.

Andrew S. Bergman (argued), Office of the Atty. Gen. of Ohio, Columbus, OH, for defendant.

Before: KEITH and RYAN, Circuit Judges; and WELLFORD, Senior Circuit Judge.


Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc Denied in No. 92-3557 November 30, 1993.

RYAN, Circuit Judge.

The defendants, Ohio Tax Commissioner Roger W. Tracy and Ohio Treasurer Mary E. Withrow, appeal following the district court's April 24, 1992, order allowing two different groups of interstate railroads to intervene as plaintiffs,1 and modifying its already-issued summary judgment of August 29, 1991. This summary judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases