STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Pamela WHITE, Defendant-Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Submitted on briefs October 4, 1993.
Decided November 10, 1993.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the brief of Hans P. Koesser of Kenosha.
On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and Mary E. Burke, assistant attorney general.
On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of Michael E. Nieskes, acting district attorney, and Sharon A. Riek, assistant district attorney.
Before Brown, Nettesheim, and Snyder, JJ.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
BROWN, J.
Pamela White was convicted by jury of failure to cause her daughter to attend school regularly, contrary to sec. 118.15, Stats. (1989-90).1 She raises four issues on appeal. She mainly contends that sec. 118.15 is unconstitutionally vague because the phrase "attend school regularly" does not give a person of ordinary intelligence fair notice of the conduct required or prohibited. We hold that sec. 118.15, viewed as a whole, explains...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.