Sondra Kaplan, Respondent,
v.
Nessa Kaplan et al., Appellants.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued September 7, 1993.
Submitted on reargument October 6, 1993.
Decided November 16, 1993.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle, New York City (T. Barry Kingham and Michelle A. Rice of counsel), for Nessa Kaplan, appellant.
O. Peter Sherwood, Corporation Counsel of New York City (Edward F. X. Hart, Larry A. Sonnenshein and Susan Sanders of counsel), for Teachers' Retirement System of City of New York, appellant.
Evan L. Gordon, New York City, for respondent.
Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SIMONS, HANCOCK, JR., BELLACOSA, SMITH and LEVINE concur.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
TITONE, J.
In Caravaggio v Retirement Bd. of Teachers' Retirement Sys. (36 N.Y.2d 348), we held that an "anti-assignment" statute prevented a member of the Teachers' Retirement System (TRS) from designating a former spouse as "irrevocable beneficiary" of pension benefits in a separation agreement, and that a subsequently executed beneficiary form filed with the Retirement...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
