1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 191 A.D.2d
  5. 191 A.D.2d 183 (1993)
 

PEOPLE v. ODIAT

191 A.D.2d 183 (1993)

594 N.Y.S.2d 38

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Pedro Odiat, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

March 2, 1993

Ordinarily, where a defendant claims that a Sandoval hearing was conducted in his absence, and the record is ambiguous as to his presence, as it is herein, we will hold the appeal in abeyance and remand for a hearing on that issue (see, People v Rose, 172 A.D.2d 230). However, that procedure is not warranted where the record reveals that defendant's presence at the Sandoval hearing would have been "useless, or...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases