1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 72 Wn.
  5. 72 Wn. App. 289 (1993)
 

RUFF v. COUNTY OF KING

No. 31504-8-I.

72 Wn. App. 289 (1993)

865 P.2d 5

RITA S. RUFF, ET AL, Petitioners, v. THE COUNTY OF KING, ET AL, Respondents.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

December 30, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sim Osborn and Kargianis & Erickson, for petitioners.

Norm Maleng, Prosecuting Attorney, and Jill Hendrix, Deputy, for respondents.

FORREST, J.

Jon Jason Ruff appeals the trial court's order granting King County's motion for partial summary judgment on the ground that the driver was the sole legal proximate cause of the accident. Ruff also seeks review of the trial court's order denying his motion for partial summary judgment, arguing that King County presented no evidence of his comparative fault. We reverse in part and affirm in part the trial court's holdings and remand the case for trial....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases