LEES v. LOBOSCO


265 N.J. Super. 95 (1993)

625 A.2d 573

WILLIAM J. LEES AND CHARLOTTE LEES, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. ATTILLO LOBOSCO AND ELVIRA LOBOSCO, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 2, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harvey R. Browne argued the cause for appellants (Browne and Galluccio, attorneys).

Patrick M. Sages argued the cause for respondents (Hack, Piro, O'Day, Merklinger, Wallace & McKenna, attorneys).

Before Judges GAULKIN, HAVEY and STERN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by GAULKIN, P.J.A.D.

This case presents yet another question as to the scope of the "fireman's rule": does it apply to a suit brought by a municipally-employed emergency medical technician? We hold that it does not.

Plaintiff William J. Lees, an emergency medical technician (EMT) employed in the Paterson Fire Department, was dispatched to render emergency medical assistance to defendant Attillo Lobosco at his home. While...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases