GAINESVILLE RADIOLOGY v. HUMMEL

S92G1401.

263 Ga. 91 (1993)

428 S.E.2d 786

GAINESVILLE RADIOLOGY GROUP et al. v. HUMMEL.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

Decided May 3, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Forrester & Brim, Weymon H. Forrester, James E. Brim III, for appellants.

The Keenan & Ashman Firm, Don C. Keenan, David S. Bills, Jeffrey W. Lasky, Alfred L. Allgood, for appellee.


HUNSTEIN, Justice.

We granted certiorari in this case, Hummel v. Gainesville Radiology Group, P.C., 205 Ga.App. 157 (421 S.E.2d 333) (1992), to consider: "Whether the [opinion of the] Court of Appeals undermines the discretion of trial judges in matters of juror conduct and creates conflicting precedents." We conclude that it does and reverse the Court of Appeals.

Appellee, Hummel...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases