1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 269 N.J.
  5. 269 N.J. Super. 71 (1993)
 

LEWIS v. HOPEWELL VALLEY RACQUET CLUB

269 N.J. Super. 71 (1993)

634 A.2d 568

EVAN LEWIS, PLAINTIFF, v. HOPEWELL VALLEY RACQUET CLUB, ET AL., DEFENDANT. EVAN LEWIS, PLAINTIFF, v. ARROW MASTER CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. TENCOR, INC. (INCORRECTLY NAMED AS HOPEWELL VALLEY RACQUET CLUB), THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DURAFLEX, INC. AND PRINCETON POOL & PATIO, THIRD PARTY DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 10, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven Polansky argued the cause for appellant Tencor, Inc. (Spector, Gadon & Rosen, attorneys; Mr. Polansky, on the brief).

Michael K. Tuzzio argued the cause for respondent Arrow Master (Donington, Karcher, Leroe, Salmond, Luongo & Ronan, attorneys; Susan S. Rankin, on the brief).

Before Judges KING, A.M. STEIN and A.A. RODRIGUEZ.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, P.J.A.D.

This case presents the question whether a swimming pool, installed with diving stands and boards, is an "improvement to real property" within the meaning of our ten-year statute of repose, N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1.1.1 The statute protects "person[s] performing or furnishing the design, planning, supervision of construction or construction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases