ARISTECH CHEM. CORP. v. CARBOLINE CO.

No. 92CA2055.

86 Ohio App.3d 251 (1993)

ARISTECH CHEMICAL CORPORATION v. CARBOLINE COMPANY, Appellant; Sun Company, Inc., et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Scioto County.

Decided February 10, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Blumenfeld, Kaplan, Sandweiss, Marx, Ponfil & Kaskowitz, P.C., Theodore D. Ponfil and David E. Martin; McCurdy, Johnson, Ruggiero, McKenzie & Bender and Daniel P. Ruggiero, for appellant.

Lane, Alton & Horst, Gregory D. Rankin and Franklin E. Eck, Jr., for appellee Martin Painting & Coating Co.

Benjamin, Yocum & Heather, Timothy P. Heather and Anthony J. Iaciofano, for appellee R.E. Thoman, Inc.

Charles L. Cooper, for appellee J.L. Manta, Inc.

Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay, Douglas Y. Christian and Kelley A. Grady; Klein, Smith & Klein and Thomas L. Klein, for appellee Sun Company, Inc.


HARSHA, Judge.

Appellant, Carboline Company ("Carboline"), appeals from the judgment of the Scioto County Court of Common Pleas which ordered enforcement of an oral settlement agreement allegedly reached by the parties. We affirm.

Aristech Chemical Corporation ("Aristech") sued various defendants concerning allegedly defective fireproofing which had been applied to its buildings. Named in the suit were Carboline...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases