1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.2d
  4. 157 Misc.2d
  5. 157 Misc.2d 175 (1993)
 

GLASSMAN v. SCHWARTZ

157 Misc.2d 175 (1993)

___ N.Y.S.2d ___

Mervin B. Glassman, Plaintiff, v. Esther Schwartz et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Orange County.

September 15, 1993

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bloom & Bloom, New Windsor, for plaintiff. Blutrich, Herman & Miller, New York City, for Esther Schwartz and another, defendants.

HOWARD MILLER, J.

Motion by plaintiff to consolidate this motion with defendants' motion returnable October 22, 1993 and to declare service upon defendants Wieder and Schwartz valid. Plaintiff's motion is granted to the extent that the motion returnable October 11, 1993 is consolidated with the motion at bar and otherwise denied. Defendants' motion to dismiss as to defendants Schwartz and Wieder is granted and otherwise denied.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases