PITTMAN v. HARBIN CLINIC PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION

S93A0675, S93X0678, S93A0677, S93X0679.

263 Ga. 66 (1993)

428 S.E.2d 328

PITTMAN et al. v. HARBIN CLINIC PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION. HARBIN CLINIC PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION v. PITTMAN. HARBIN CLINIC PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION v. HERRING. HERRING et al. v. HARBIN CLINIC PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

Decided April 16, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cook & Palmour, Bobby Lee Cook, Gambrell, Clarke, Anderson & Stolz, Irwin W. Stolz, Jr., Seaton D. Purdom, for Pittman and Herring.

Brinson, Askew, Berry, Seigler, Richardson & Davis, C. King Askew, Mark M. J. Webb, for Harbin Clinic Professional Association.


PER CURIAM.

These appeals and cross-appeals have been filed concerning restrictive covenants in employment contracts between physicians and the Harbin Clinic Professional Association. The trial court upheld the restrictive covenants in the contracts of two Harbin Clinic partners and invalidated the restrictive covenants in the employment contracts of the doctors who were not partners. All parties invoke the appellate jurisdiction of this court based on the trial court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases