1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 265 N.J.
  5. 265 N.J. Super. 63 (1993)
 

STATE v. FORGIONE

265 N.J. Super. 63 (1993)

625 A.2d 557

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PETER J. FORGIONE AND LEONARD A. IACONO, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 28, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephanie P. Tettemer, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (John J. O'Reilly, Warren County Prosecutor, attorney).

James L. Pfeiffer argued the cause for respondent Forgione (Coyle & Pfeiffer, attorneys).

Herr, Pursel and Espey, attorneys for respondent Iacono (Lowell Espey, on the letter joining the brief filed by respondent Forgione).

Before Judges PRESSLER, R.S. COHEN, and MUIR, Jr.

The opinion of the court was delivered by MUIR, Jr., J.A.D.

This appeal requires us to determine whether the provisions of N.J.S.A. 39:3-15, which exempt from the automobile equipment standards of Title 39 a vehicle licensed in another state and owned by a resident of that state, prevent a law enforcement officer in this state from stopping such a vehicle for a defective rear brake light. We conclude it does...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases