1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 4 F.3d
  5. 4 F.3d 323 (1993)
 

SAILOR v. HUBBELL, INC.

Nos. 92-1135, 92-1161.

4 F.3d 323 (1993)

William SAILOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HUBBELL, INCORPORATED; Pulse Communications, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees, and Pulsecom Division, Hubbell, Incorporated, Defendant. William SAILOR, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HUBBELL, INCORPORATED; Pulse Communications, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellants, and Pulsecom Division, Hubbell, Incorporated, Defendant.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided September 7, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ruth Ann King, Manassas, VA, argued, for plaintiff-appellant.

Michael Frank Marino, Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay, McLean, VA, argued (Thomas P. Murphy, Mark B. Peabody, on brief), for defendants-appellees.

Before RUSSELL, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

DONALD RUSSELL, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff William Sailor appeals the district court's dismissal, after a bench trial, of his claims against his former employer, Hubbell Incorporated ("Hubbell"),1 under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 ("ADEA"), and argues that the district court committed reversible error by refusing to give him a jury trial. While we agree that the district court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases