1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 8 F.3d
  5. 8 F.3d 316 (1993)
 

U.S. v. HOFSTATTER

Nos. 92-1805/1836.

8 F.3d 316 (1993)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Karl HOFSTATTER (92-1836) and Michael Griffor (92-1805), Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided September 28, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Terrence G. Berg (argued and briefed), Office of the U.S. Atty., Detroit, MI, for U.S.

Douglas R. Mullkoff (argued and briefed), Ann Arbor, MI, for Michael Edward Griffor.

F. Randall Karfonta (argued and briefed), Mogill, Posner & Cohen, Detroit, MI, for Karl Hofstatter.

Before: NELSON and SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judges, and CELEBREZZE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Under 21 U.S.C. § 841(d)(1), it is a criminal offense knowingly or intentionally to possess a "listed" chemical with intent to manufacture a controlled substance. Under 21 U.S.C. § 813, as enacted in the Controlled Substance Analogue Enforcement Act of 1986, a "controlled substance analogue" is treated as a controlled substance to the extent that it is intended for human consumption.

The defendants in the case at bar were found guilty...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases