BANK OF STAMFORD v. ALAIMO

(10817)

31 Conn. App. 1 (1993)

BANK OF STAMFORD v. ROSARIA ALAIMO ET AL.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decision released April 13, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jules Lang, for the appellant (named defendant).

Scott M. Harrington, with whom, on the brief, was Ellery E. Plotkin, for the appellee (substitute plaintiff).

Reuben S. Midler, for Richard Testa (defendant).

O'CONNELL, LAVERY and SCHALLER, JS.


LAVERY, J.

The issue presented by this case is whether a defendant, in a hearing on a motion for deficiency judgment after a judgment of foreclosure has entered, the law days have passed, and title has vested, can raise defenses that could have been raised and decided in the foreclosure hearing, but were not. The trial court answered this question in the negative and we agree.

The plaintiff1 was the holder of a note that was signed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases