COSTA-HUGHES v. MULLEN CONST. CO.


134 N.J. 187 (1993)

631 A.2d 1245

MARIA RIBEIRO COSTA-HUGHES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. MULLEN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided October 28, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark B. Zirulnik argued the cause for appellant (Isaacson, Dougherty & Zirulnik, attorneys; Louis M. Masucci, Jr., on the brief).

Robert A. Greenberg argued the cause for respondent (Ravich, Koster, Tobin, Oleckna, Reitman & Greenstein, attorneys).


PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 267 N.J.Super. 439, 631 A.2d 1245 (1992).

STEIN, J., dissenting.

I would reverse, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Brochin's dissenting opinion, reported at 267 N.J.Super. 439...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases