GARFIELD MALL ASSOC. v. CUYAHOGA CTY. BD. OF REVISION

No. 92-951.

66 Ohio St.3d 247 (1993)

GARFIELD MALL ASSOCIATES, APPELLANT, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL.; GARFIELD HEIGHTS BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 19, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fred Siegal Co., L.P.A., Fred Siegal, Todd W. Sleggs and Stephen R. Gill, for appellant.

Arter & Hadden and Donald G. Paynter, for appellee, Garfield Heights Board of Education.


Per Curiam.

The determinative issue herein is the true value of Garfield Mall. Appellant essentially questions the decision of the BTA to adopt the valuation given by appellee's appraiser. Appellant's expert witness did not appraise the subject real estate in arriving at true value, but merely reviewed documents dealing with Friedman's acquisition of the partnership interest in Garfield Mall Associates. On the other hand, appellee's appraiser inspected the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases