1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 265 N.J.
  5. 265 N.J. Super. 47 (1993)
 

HORN v. MAZDA MOTOR OF AMERICA

265 N.J. Super. 47 (1993)

625 A.2d 548

ROBERT HORN AND JOHN G. SENECA, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. MAZDA MOTOR OF AMERICA, INC. AND W.D. GOETZE, INDIVIDUALLY, JOINTLY, SEVERALLY, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 28, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Job Taylor, III, of the New York Bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for appellants (Young, Rose, Imbriaco & Burke, attorneys; Mr. Burke, Mr. Taylor, Louise Zeitzew and Lance Suede, on the brief).

Stephen Bernstein argued the cause for respondents (Bivona, Cohen, Kunzman, Coley, Yospin, Bernstein & DiFranceso, attorneys; Mr. Bernstein, on the brief).

Before Judges HAVEY, STERN and BROCHIN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by BROCHIN, J.A.D.

Brunswick Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. (d/b/a Brunswick Mazda) is an automobile dealership that sold both Chrysler and Mazda automobiles. On April 10, 1990, plaintiffs Robert Horn and John G. Seneca, who owned other automobile dealerships, entered into an agreement with the owner of Brunswick Mazda, Daniel A. Brady, to buy its assets.

In order to be able to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases