PAUL REVERE LIFE INS. CO. v. HAAS


266 N.J. Super. 35 (1993)

628 A.2d 772

THE PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. GILBERT K. HAAS, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 7, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Wright argued the cause for appellant (Melli & Wright, attorneys; Mr. Wright and Cynthia Dokas on the brief).

Brian T. Campion argued the cause for respondent (Herten, Burstein, Sheridan & Cevasco, attorneys; Mr. Campion on the brief).

Before Judges GAULKIN, HAVEY and STERN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by HAVEY, J.A.D.

Plaintiff Paul Revere Life Insurance Company appeals from a summary judgment dismissing its complaint against its insured, defendant Gilbert K. Haas. The gravamen of plaintiff's complaint is that its disability insurance policy issued to defendant should be rescinded because of material misrepresentations made by him in his application for insurance. Alternatively, plaintiff seeks a

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases