1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 20 Cal.App.4th
  5. 20 Cal.App.4th 281 (1993)
 

DAVID A. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CITY AND CTY. OF SAN FRANCISCO

Docket No. A059421.

20 Cal.App.4th 281 (1993)

24 Cal. Rptr.2d 537

DAVID A. et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent; JANE D., Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

November 23, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Nossaman, Guthner, Knox & Elliott, Patrick J. Richard and Kurt W. Melchior for Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

Belli, Belli, Brown, Monzione, Fabro & Zkaria and Kevin R. McLean for Real Party in Interest.

Dawn M. Schock as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

KLINE, P.J.

This writ proceeding raises the question whether an adult plaintiff, whose claim for damages for childhood sexual abuse lapsed in 1988 under then-governing law, may take advantage of the liberalized statute of limitations enacted in 1990. We have concluded that the statutory amendments of 1990 did not revive previously lapsed claims and that this action is therefore...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases