SCHULZ v. SULLIVAN

Nos. C-920694, C-920701.

92 Ohio App.3d 205 (1993)

SCHULZ, Appellee, v. SULLIVAN et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Hamilton County.

Decided December 22, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jacobs, Kleinman, Seibel & McNally and Mark J. Byrne, for appellee.

White, Getgey & Meyer and Gregory A. Ruehlman, for appellants Thomas and Mary Sullivan.

Daniel F. Burke, for appellants Panaro Realty, Inc. and Daniel Sullivan.


Per Curiam.

Defendants-appellants Thomas and Mary Sullivan ("the Sullivans"), Panaro Realty, Inc., and Daniel Sullivan appeal from the judgment of the trial court, entered on August 10, 1992, in favor of the plaintiff-appellee, Diane Schulz. In their multiple assignments of error, the appellants claim, in essence, that the evidence adduced at trial failed to establish that the appellants, by failing to disclose...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases