1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 265 N.J.
  5. 265 N.J. Super. 32 (1993)
 

HORESH v. STATE FARM FIRE & CAS. CO.

265 N.J. Super. 32 (1993)

625 A.2d 541

ESTA HORESH, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, CROSS-APPELLANT, v. STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, CROSS-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 27, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Craig M. Terkowitz argued the cause for appellant, cross-respondent (Vitiello, Seltzer, Terkowitz & Vitiello, attorneys, Kenneth A. Seltzer of counsel and on the brief).

David L. Ploshnick argued the cause for respondent, cross-appellant (Baer, Arbeiter & Ploshnick, attorneys, Mr. Ploshnick of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, R.S. COHEN and KESTIN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by R.S. COHEN, J.A.D.

Plaintiff's husband started an action to recover for an injury to their infant son. Defendants filed a third-party complaint against plaintiff for contribution and indemnification. State Farm was the family's homeowners' insurer. Plaintiff requested State Farm to defend her, but it declined to do so. State Farm took the position that the claim was excluded by the terms of the insurance policy. Plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases