HEUER v. DIRECTOR, DIV. OF TAX.


14 N.J. Tax 283 (1993)

JOHN F. HEUER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 13, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur W. Burgess argued the cause for appellant (Joseph R. Bulman, on the brief).

Gail L. Menyuk, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Fred DeVesa, Acting Attorney General, attorney; Joseph L. Yannotti, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Thomas D. Kimmett, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).

Before Judges PETRELLA and BAIME.


PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff John F. Heuer contests the imposition of a use tax by New Jersey upon the use in this state of his fifty-foot boat, which he purchased in Maryland at a public sale ordered by the United States District Court for the District of Maryland in 1987.

The Tax Court of New Jersey heard the matter on cross-motions for summary judgment with certain stipulated facts. There is no question that Heuer did not pay any sales or use tax to either Maryland...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases