IN RE SELTZER

No. 92-1400.

67 Ohio St.3d 220 (1993)

IN RE SELTZER.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided September 1, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Walter, Haverfield, Buescher & Chockley, John H. Gibbon, Kenneth A. Zirm and C. David Paragas, for appellee.

Lee Fisher, Attorney General, Cordelia Glenn and William J. McDonald, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellant.


WRIGHT, J.

This case presents the issue of whether orders issued by the Administrator of the Bureau of Workers' Compensation pursuant to R.C. 4121.-44(R) are subject to review under the Administrative Procedure Act, R.C. Chapter 119. For the reasons stated below we find that such orders are not subject to appellate review pursuant to R.C. Chapter 119.

The Ohio Constitution provides for the creation of the courts of common pleas. The Constitution, however,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases