1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 264 N.J.
  5. 264 N.J. Super. 17 (1993)
 

MURRAY v. LAWSON

264 N.J. Super. 17 (1993)

624 A.2d 3

BELINDA MURRAY AND ELRICK A. MURRAY, M.D., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. MICHAEL ANDREW LAWSON, DAVID CRIST, JANE DOE (A FICTITIOUS NAME) AND JOHN DOE (A FICTITIOUS NAME), DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 12, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard F. Collier, Jr., attorney for appellants (Mr. Collier, on the brief).

Pamela Mandel, attorney for respondents (Ms. Mandel, on the brief).

Before Judges KING, BRODY and LANDAU.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, P.J.A.D.

In this case plaintiffs sought damages and injunctive relief against defendants for picketing in an harassing manner in front of their home in Westfield on January 20, 1991. Plaintiff Elrick A. Murray, M.D., is a physician who performs abortions. Defendants are anti-abortionists. The Chancery Division judge dismissed the damages claim but entered a permanent injunction against pickets or demonstrations by defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases