CONCERNED WOMEN v. ARLINGTON

No. 30217-5-I.

69 Wn. App. 209 (1993)

847 P.2d 963

CONCERNED ORGANIZED WOMEN AND PEOPLE OPPOSED TO OFFENSIVE PROPOSALS, INC., Appellant, v. THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, ET AL, Respondents.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

March 29, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Julian C. Dewell and Law Office of Anderson Hunter, for appellant.

Madeleine Brenner and Buck & Gordon; Steven J. Peiffle and Bailey Duskin & Peiffle; Bruce R. Bell and Bell & Ingram, for respondents.


FORREST, J.

Concerned Organized Women and People Opposed to Offensive Proposals, Inc. (Concerned Women) appeals the trial court's order denying its application for a statutory writ of certiorari and a constitutional writ of certiorari, dismissing its action with prejudice, and awarding Northward Homes, Inc. (Northward) $125 in statutory attorney fees. Concerned Women also appeals the court's denial of its motion for reconsideration claiming the court erred in finding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases