1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 66 Ohio
  5. 66 Ohio St.3d 209 (1993)
 

PIE MUT. INS. CO. v. OHIO INS. GUAR. ASSN.

Nos. 91-2392 and 91-2399.

66 Ohio St.3d 209 (1993)

PIE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. OHIO INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION, APPELLEE; PHYSICIANS INSURANCE COMPANY OF OHIO, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 12, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jacobson, Maynard, Tuschman & Kalur Co., L.P.A., Gayle E. Arnold and Karen L. Clouse, for appellant PIE Mutual Insurance Company.

Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease and F. James Foley, for appellee.

Hammond & Willard and Gary W. Hammond, for appellant Physicians Insurance Company of Ohio.

MOYER, C.J.

This case presents for our consideration the extent of OIGA's liability under R.C. Chapter 3955.2 The central issue is whether OIGA is required to reimburse two insurance carriers for a pro-rata share of amounts the insurers paid to settle a medical malpractice action.

I

At the outset, it is important to recognize the General Assembly's purpose behind the enactment of R.C. Chapter 3955, the Ohio Insurance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases