Defendant claimed at trial that he too was a purchaser together with the undercover officer in an apartment located at 1055 University Avenue in the Bronx. Accordingly, the evidence concerning prior complaints of drug activity at that building and from that apartment did not prejudice the defendant and, in any event, was not appropriately objected to at trial, thereby waiving the issue for appellate review. Further, the summation comment objected to was stricken.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
