1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 193 A.D.2d
  5. 193 A.D.2d 70 (1993)
 

DWYER v. NICHOLSON

193 A.D.2d 70 (1993)

Diane Dwyer, Respondent-Appellant, v. Michael Nicholson et al, Appellants-Respondents. Carmine A. Ventiera et al., Nonparty Respondents-Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

September 20, 1993

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nathan R. Sobel, Brooklyn, for appellants-respondents.

Foley, Hickey, Gilbert & O'Reilly, New York City (Terry P. O'Reilly on the brief), for respondent-appellant.

Cahill & Cahill, Brooklyn (James H. Cahill of counsel), for nonparty respondents-appellants.

BRACKEN, J. P., MILLER, COPERTINO and SANTUCCI, JJ., concur.

Per Curiam.

We conclude that the plaintiff's decedent, Peter Dwyer, and the defendant Michael Nicholson agreed that, upon the dissolution of their partnership, the only items that would be subject to distribution would be "net income, cash and other deposits in partnership bank accounts, and accounts receivable". Because these parties agreed that the value of contingency fee cases...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases