1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 994 F.2d
  5. 994 F.2d 1569 (1993)
 

EASTMAN KODAK CO. v. BELL & HOWELL DOC. MGT. PRODUCTS CO.

No. 92-1482.

994 F.2d 1569 (1993)

EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, Appellant, v. BELL & HOWELL DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT PRODUCTS COMPANY, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 2, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard D. Rochford, Jr., Nixon, Hargrave, Devans & Doyle, of Rochester, NY, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was James D. Kole. Also on the brief was Kathleen F. Tranelli, Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY.

Howard B. Rockman Welsh & Katz, Ltd., Chicago, IL, argued for appellee. With him on the brief was Kathleen A. White.

David Goldberg, Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C., of New York City, was on the brief for the amicus curiae, Xerox Corp.

Before MICHEL, Circuit Judge, SMITH, Senior Circuit Judge, and SCHALL, Circuit Judge.

MICHEL, Circuit Judge.

Eastman Kodak Company (Kodak) appeals from the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Board) of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) in an intent-to-use application proceeding under the Lanham Act, as amended by the Trademark Law Revision Act of 1988, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051-1127 (1992),1 Eastman Kodak Co. v. Bell & Howell Document Management Prods. Co., Nos. 86,083, 86,093, and 86,101...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases