1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 983 F.2d
  5. 983 F.2d 1573 (1993)
 

VANCE v. SOUTHERN BELL TEL. & TEL. CO.

No. 90-3559.

983 F.2d 1573 (1993)

Mary Ann VANCE, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, a Georgia Corporation, Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, Joyce Foskey, et al., Defendants.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

February 5, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dana G. Bradford, II, Lee S. Haramis, Baumer, Bradford & Walters, P.A., Jacksonville, FL, for appellant.

Robert L. Wiggins, Jr., Birmingham, AL, Scott Fortune, Atlantic Beach, FL, for appellee.

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.

EDMONDSON, Circuit Judge:

Mary Ann Vance won a jury verdict on her claim that Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company ("Southern Bell") violated her rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Southern Bell appeals the denial of its motions for summary judgment, directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict on Vance's section 1981 claim. We reverse.

I. Background

A. The First Trial: Vance I

This case is detailed in Vance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases