BIEGELEISEN v. JACOBSON


198 A.D.2d 57 (1993)

603 N.Y.S.2d 148

Ken Biegeleisen, Appellant, v. Julius Jacobson, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

November 9, 1993


The statements defendant made during his testimony as an expert witness in the medical malpractice action that had been brought against plaintiff cannot be the subject of a defamation action unless they constituted falsehoods "so obviously irrelevant as to warrant an inference of express malice" (Tolisano v Texon, 144 A.D.2d 267, 272 [Smith, J., dissenting], revd for reasons stated in dissenting mem 75 N.Y...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases