1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 987 F.2d
  5. 987 F.2d 1556 (1993)
 

DECOSTA v. U.S.

No. 91-5147.

987 F.2d 1556 (1993)

James E. DeCOSTA, Vinson D. Thomas, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 3, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ira M. Lechner, Katz & Ranzman, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants.

Domenique Kirchner, Atty., Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With her on the brief were Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director and James M. Kinsella, Asst. Director.

Before MICHEL, PLAGER, LOURIE, Circuit Judges.

MICHEL, Circuit Judge.

James E. DeCosta and Vinson D. Thomas sued their employer, the United States, in the United States Claims Court1 under the Back Pay Act, 5 U.S.C. § 5596 (1988), asserting entitlement under certain provisions of the Federal Employees Pay Act to additional compensation for regularly scheduled overtime work in excess of eight hours per day but less than 40 hours per week. 5 U.S.C. §§ 5542, 5545 and 5546...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases