1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 996 F.2d
  5. 996 F.2d 1541 (1993)
 

U.S. v. PAULINO

Nos. 92-1748, 92-1576, 92-1580, 92-1583, 92-1587 and 92-1622.

996 F.2d 1541 (1993)

UNITED STATES of America v. Ramon Enrique PAULINO, a/k/a "Rafael", a/k/a Ramon Suarez, a/k/a "Ramon E. Gomez", a/k/a "Chino", a/k/a "Chukin", Ramon Enrique Paulino, Appellant in No. 92-1748. UNITED STATES of America v. Luis PAULINO, Appellant in No. 92-1576. UNITED STATES of America v. Eduardo Burgos LOPEZ, a/k/a "Louie", a/k/a "Gigio Paulino", Eduardo Burgos Lopez, Appellant in No. 92-1580. UNITED STATES of America v. Luis Hugo GARCIA a/k/a "Cujo", Luis Hugo Garcia, Appellant in No. 92-1583. UNITED STATES of America v. Jose Joaquin RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a Jose Joaquin, Luis Joaquin, Louie, Geovanni, Jose Joaquin Rodriguez, Appellant in No. 92-1587. UNITED STATES of America v. Danilo Jacinto LEONARDO, a/k/a "Freddie Leon", Freddie Leon, Appellant in No. 92-1622.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Decided June 28, 1993.

Sur Petition for Rehearing July 27, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark C. Levy (argued), Saul, Ewing, Remick & Saul, Philadelphia, PA, for appellant in No. 92-1748.

Jack L. Gruenstein, Philadelphia, PA, for appellant in No. 92-1576.

Louis J. Ruch, Ruch & Gontram, Philadelphia, PA, for appellant in No. 92-1580.

Jules Epstein (argued), Kairys, Rudovsky, Kalman & Epstein, Philadelphia, PA, for appellant in No. 92-1583.

William T. Cannon, Philadelphia, PA, for appellant in No. 92-1587.

Diane V. Elliott (argued), Easton, PA, for appellant in No. 92-1622.

Walter S. Batty, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Chief of Appeals, John C. Dodds (argued), Michael M. Baylson, Office of U.S. Atty., Philadelphia, PA, for appellee.

Before: MANSMANN, SCIRICA and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges.

Sur Petition for Rehearing July 27, 1993 in No. 92-1748.

OPINION OF THE COURT

MANSMANN, Circuit Judge.

Before us are the appeals from criminal judgments entered against several participants in a drug conspiracy which operated out of the Saloon Bar in Reading, Pennsylvania. Although the defendants have raised multiple individual grounds for appeal,1 we address only the issue common to the convicted co-conspirators

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases