BRUNETTI v. REED

No. 30192-6-I.

70 Wn. App. 180 (1993)

852 P.2d 1099

KATHLEEN BRUNETTI, ET AL, Appellants, v. STANLEY W. REED, ET AL, Respondents.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

June 1, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harrison H. deMers, Christopher A. Benson, and deMers & Associates, Inc., P.S., for appellants.

Kent C. Meyer and Ogden Murphy Wallace, for respondents.


KENNEDY, J.

Appellants Kathleen and Thomas Brunetti appeal the trial court's denial of their motion to vacate the earlier dismissal of their tort action against respondents Stanley and "Jane Doe" Reed. Finding that the earlier dismissal of the case was not violative of the automatic stay provisions of the bankruptcy code or otherwise improper, we affirm the trial court's denial of the motion to vacate the earlier dismissal.

FACTS

On July 22, 1987...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases