GILBERT SPRUANCE v. PENNSYLVANIA MFRS.


134 N.J. 96 (1993)

629 A.2d 885

THE GILBERT SPRUANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. PENNSYLVANIA MANUFACTURERS' ASSOCIATION INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, DEFENDANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 21, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gerald M. Eisenstat argued the cause for appellant (Eisenstat, Gabage & Berman, attorneys; Mr. Eisenstat, Mitchell S. Berman, and Mark C. Schultz, on the brief).

Henry H. Janssen argued the cause for respondent (Rapp, White, Janssen & German, attorneys).


The opinion of the Court was delivered by CLIFFORD, J.

We granted certification, 130 N.J. 14, 611 A.2d 652 (1992), to address the sole question presented in the petition of defendant Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Insurance Company (PMA), namely, "whether a comprehensive general liability policy containing a pollution exclusion, issued by an out-of-state carrier and covering an out-of-state defendant's operations, should be construed pursuant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases