1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 996 F.2d
  5. 996 F.2d 1294 (1993)
 

BRODERICK v. ROACHE

No. 92-2389.

996 F.2d 1294 (1993)

William T. BRODERICK, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellees, v. Francis ROACHE, et al., Defendants, Appellees. Arthur Morgan, Jr., Plaintiff, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Decided June 18, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Walter B. Prince with whom Peckham, Lobel, Casey, Prince & Tye, Boston, MA, was on brief for plaintiff, appellant.

James F. Lamond with whom Alan J. McDonald and McDonald, Noonan and Lamond, Newton, MA, were on brief for defendants, appellees William T. Broderick, et al.

Before TORRUELLA and STAHL, Circuit Judges, and BURNS, District Judge.

STAHL, Circuit Judge.

In this appeal, defendant-appellant Arthur Morgan, Jr. ("Morgan") challenges the district court's ruling that he was not entitled to qualified immunity. Finding no error in the district court's ruling, we affirm.

I.

BACKGROUND

On May 12, 1990, plaintiffs-appellees the Boston Police Superior Officers Federation ("Federation") and William Broderick ("Broderick"), an employee of the Boston Police Department...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases