1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 983 F.2d
  5. 983 F.2d 1295 (1993)
 

CAVINESS v. DERAND RESOURCES CORP.

No. 92-1413.

983 F.2d 1295 (1993)

Robert J. CAVINESS; Barry J. Friedman; Brian A. Johnson; Mark H. Tuohey, III; Patrick J. Haley, Jr.; Joseph E. Kampa; Michael Hasten Bowman; Carolyn Ann Bowman; Big Wheel Bikes, Incorporated; Caby C. Smith; Brian J. McGregor; Katherine S. Feghali; Charles L. Frazier; Deborah White; Richard J. Davey; Clifford R. Dunning, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Jesus D. Tapiador; Kathleen H. Kampa; Michael D. Sendar, Plaintiffs, v. DERAND RESOURCES CORPORATION; Derand Equity Group, Incorporated; Derand Energy Corporation; Arlington Energy Corporation; Derand Corporation of America; Rome Resources Corporation; Derand Investment Corporation of America; Derand/Pennington/Bass, Incorporated; Randall N. Smith; Malcolm R. Rudolph; Denison E. Smith; Dan R. Kiely; William A. Conway; David B. Reese; Carlile and Howell, Incorporated; Marshall Exploration, Incorporated; Kenneth Q. Carlile, Defendants-Appellees, and Daniel C. Snyder; Rebecca J. Poth; Darcy Smith; Lynn Greenhouse; Frank H. Jacobeen, Jr.; Charles H. Chaney; John E. Johnson; Martex Drilling Co.; H & C Well Services, Incorporated; Crosstex Pipeline, Incorporated; Crosstex Pipeline Company; Quinton B. Carlile; T.D. Howell; Steven B. Carlile; James Lyle, Defendants.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided January 11, 1993.

As Amended January 26, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Norman Levin, Schweitzer, Bentzen & Scherr, Washington, DC, argued (William C. Dickerson, on brief), for plaintiffs-appellants.

Anthony John Trenga, Hazel & Thomas, P.C., Alexandria, VA, argued (Anne M. Richard, Hazel & Thomas, P.C., Alexandria, VA; Kim J. Askew, Theodore Stevenson, III, Hughes & Luce, L.L.P., Dallas, TX, on brief), for Marshall defendants-appellees.

Howard V.B. Sinclair, Arent, Fox, Kintner, Plotkin & Kahn, Washington, DC, argued (Jason S. Palmer, on brief), for DeRand, defendants-appellees.

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge:

We are presented with questions about the proper application of statutes of limitations to securities fraud claims, the principal issues being whether the three-year period of repose contained in § 13 of the Securities Act of 1933 may be extended by a theory of integration1 or tolled by fraudulent concealment or equitable estoppel. We are also presented...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases