PEOPLE v. BOLDEN


81 N.Y.2d 146 (1993)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Samuel Bolden, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided February 25, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin Geoffrey Goldberg, Franklin Square, for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney of Kings County, Brooklyn (Richard T. Faughnan, Jay M. Cohen and Leonard Joblove of counsel), for respondent.

Andrew C. Fine, New York City, for Criminal Appeals Bureau of the Legal Aid Society of New York, amicus curiae.

Acting Chief Judge SIMONS and Judges KAYE and HANCOCK, JR., concur with Judge TITONE; Judge BELLACOSA dissents and votes to affirm in a separate opinion in which Judge SMITH concurs.


TITONE, J.

CPL 30.30 (4) (c) excludes certain periods during which the defendant is "absent" or "unavailable" from the time in which the People must otherwise become ready for trial. In 1984, the Legislature amended that paragraph to expand the scope of its exclusion (L 1984, ch 670). The issue in this appeal is whether the previously existing requirement that the People must exercise "due diligence" in locating...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases