CATO v. CATO

(14546)

226 Conn. 1 (1993)

JUDITH A. CATO v. HERBERT J. CATO, JR.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decision released June 22, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William H. Meanix, Jr., with whom were William R. Kinloch and Daniel C. Spineti, for the appellant (defendant).

John K. Currie, with whom was Courtney B. Bourns, for the appellee (plaintiff).

PETERS, C. J., CALLAHAN, BORDEN, BERDON and KATZ, JS.


BERDON, J.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether an order of notice is necessary to meet the jurisdictional requirements of General Statutes (Rev. to 1989) § 46b-46,1 the domestic relations long-arm statute. In this action for a dissolution of marriage, the defendant, who resided in Texas and received in-hand service of process by a process server in Texas, challenges the jurisdiction of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases