1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 996 F.2d
  5. 996 F.2d 1263 (1993)
 

LaROUCHE v. FEDERAL ELECTION COM'N

No. 92-1100.

996 F.2d 1263 (1993)

Lyndon H. LaROUCHE and Democrats for Economic Recovery-LaRouche in 92, Petitioners, v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided July 2, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James F. Schoener, Sarasota, FL, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Richard Mayberry, Washington, DC.

Richard B. Bader, Associate General Counsel, Federal Election Com'n, Washington, DC, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Lawrence M. Noble, General Counsel and Marcus C. Migliore, Attorney, Federal Election Com'n, Washington, DC.

Before: WALD, BUCKLEY and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WILLIAMS.

Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge WALD.

STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge:

The Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act, 26 U.S.C. §§ 9031-42 ("Matching Payment Act" or "the Act"), sets forth specific requirements that must be satisfied before the Federal Elections Commission certifies a candidate for receipt of matching funds. The key...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases