1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 999 F.2d
  5. 999 F.2d 1257 (1993)
 

METROPOLITAN FEDERAL BANK v. W. R. GRACE & CO.

Nos. 92-1769, 92-1807, 92-2181, 92-2329.

999 F.2d 1257 (1993)

METROPOLITAN FEDERAL BANK OF IOWA, F.S.B., Plaintiff-Appellant, Metropolitan Federal Bank of Minnesota, F.S.B.; Metropolitan Federal Bank, F.S.B., Plaintiffs, v. W.R. GRACE & CO.; W.R. Grace & Co. — Conn., Defendants-Appellants, United States Gypsum Corporation, Defendant. METROPOLITAN FEDERAL BANK OF IOWA, F.S.B., Plaintiff-Appellee, Metropolitan Federal Bank of Minnesota, F.S.B., Plaintiff-Appellee, Metropolitan Federal Bank, F.S.B., Plaintiff, v. W.R. GRACE & CO.; W.R. Grace & Co. — Conn., Defendants-Appellants, United States Gypsum Corporation, Defendant. METROPOLITAN FEDERAL BANK OF IOWA, Plaintiff, Metropolitan Federal Bank of Minnesota, Plaintiff-Appellant, Metropolitan Federal Bank, Plaintiff, v. W.R. GRACE & CO.; W.R. Grace & Co. — Conn., Defendants-Appellees, United States Gypsum Corporation, Defendant. METROPOLITAN FEDERAL BANK OF IOWA, F.S.B., Plaintiff, Metropolitan Federal Bank of Minnesota, F.S.B., Plaintiff-Appellee, Metropolitan Federal Bank, F.S.B., Plaintiff, v. W.R. GRACE & CO.; W.R. Grace & Co. — Conn., Defendants-Appellants, United States Gypsum Corporation, Defendant.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided July 27, 1993.

Rehearing Denied September 8, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel A. Speights, Hampton, SC, argued (Steven C. Lian, Minot, ND, and Jon M. Arntson, Fargo, ND, on brief), for appellant.

Kell M. Damsgaard, Philadelphia, PA, argued (Dennis J. Valenza of Philadelphia, PA, and Sandra Wallace Napolitano, Thomas B. Caswell, and Brooks F. Poley, Minneapolis, MN, on brief), for appellee, U.S. Gypsum.

Allen W. Hinderaker, Minneapolis, MN, argued (Hugh V. Plunkett, III, and Keith J. Halleland, on brief), for appellee, W.R. Grace & Co.

Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

BOWMAN, Circuit Judge.

Metropolitan Federal Bank of Minnesota appeals the decision of the District Court1 to grant summary judgment to W.R. Grace & Company and W.R. Grace & Company — Connecticut2 (collectively W.R. Grace) on Metropolitan's claims for recovery of asbestos abatement costs. W.R. Grace cross-appeals, challenging the District Court's decision to extend the time to file the notice...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases