STERLING SUFFOLK RACECOURSE LTD. PARTNERSHIP v. BURRELLVILLE RACING ASS'N

No. 92-2260.

989 F.2d 1266 (1993)

STERLING SUFFOLK RACECOURSE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. BURRILLVILLE RACING ASSOCIATION, INC., Defendant, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Decided March 25, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E. Randolph Tucker, with whom Michael D. Ricciuti, David B. Crevier, Joshua M. Davis, and Hill & Barlow were on brief, for plaintiff, appellant.

Kent E. Mast, with whom Peter J. McGinn, Tillinghast Collins & Graham, and Kilpatrick & Cody were on brief, for defendant, appellee.

Before SELYA, CYR and STAHL, Circuit Judges.


SELYA, Circuit Judge.

In this appeal, we confront two issues of novel impression at the appellate level. First, we must determine whether the Interstate Horseracing Act (IHA), 15 U.S.C. §§ 3001-3007 (1988), the full text of which is set out in the appendix, contains an implied private right of action in favor of racetracks situated within sixty miles of a display track, i.e., a track that accepts interstate off-track wagers on races to be run at distant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases