U.S. DEPT. OF TREASURY, I.R.S. v. F.L.R.A.

Nos. 91-1573, 91-1633.

996 F.2d 1246 (1993)

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF the TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Respondent, National Treasury Employees Union, Intervenor. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, JUSTICE MANAGEMENT DIVISION, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Respondent. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF the TREASURY, BUREAU OF PUBLIC DEBT, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Respondent, National Treasury Employees Union, Intervenor.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided June 29, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas M. Bondy, Atty., Dept. of Justice, with whom Stuart E. Schiffer, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., and William Kanter, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, were on the brief, for petitioners in 91-1573, 91-1574 and 91-1633.

James F. Blandford, Atty., Federal Labor Relations Authority, with whom David M. Smith, Solicitor, and Arthur A. Horowitz, Associate Solicitor, Federal Labor Relations Authority, Washington, DC, were on the brief, for respondent. William E. Persina and William R. Tobey, Federal Labor Relations Authority, Washington, DC, entered an appearance for respondent.

Elaine Kaplan, Deputy General Counsel, National Treasury Employees Union, with whom Gregory O'Duden, General Counsel, National Treasury Employees Union, Washington, DC, was on the brief, for intervenor.

Before: EDWARDS, RUTH BADER GINSBURG, and SILBERMAN, Circuit Judges.


Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SILBERMAN.

SILBERMAN, Circuit Judge:

Petitioners, bureaus within the Department of the Treasury and the Department of Justice, challenge decisions of the Federal Labor Relations Authority that held certain union collective bargaining proposals subject to mandatory negotiation under Title VII of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, 5 U.S.C. §§ 7101-7135 (1988). The FLRA ordered the agencies to bargain...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases