1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 874 F.Supp.
  5. 874 F.Supp. 1362 (1993)
 

QUIKRETE COMPANIES, INC. v. NOMIX CORP.

Civ. A. Nos. 1:88-CV-1080-JTC, 1:89-CV-1177-JTC.

874 F.Supp. 1362 (1993)

The QUIKRETE COMPANIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. NOMIX CORPORATION, Defendant. NOMIX CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. The QUIKRETE COMPANIES, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division.

September 17, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William H. Needle, Needle & Rosenberg, Thomas W. Rhodes, Edward H. Wasmuth, Jr., Smith, Gambrell & Russell, Atlanta, GA, for Quikrete.

Paul J. Murphy, Hunton & Williams, Atlanta, GA, Michael E. Zall, Edward R. Weingram, Michael R. Friscia, William J. Barber, Weingram & Zall, Maywood, NJ, Carol E. Kirby, AT & T Law Div., David R. Aufdenspring, Dean S. Daskal, Thomas S. Richey, Powell, Goldstein, Frazier & Murphy, Atlanta, GA, for Nomix.

ORDER

CAMP, District Judge.

This order addresses a motion by The Quikrete Companies, Inc. ["Quikrete"] for judgment as a matter of law or for a new trial and for expedited consideration [# 166 in 89-CV-1177, # 254 in 88-CV-1080]; and a motion for a protective order [184/271]. This order also concerns motions by Nomix Corporation ["Nomix"] for prejudgment interest [162/250]; for enhanced damages and attorney's fees [163/251]; for a permanent injunction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases