1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 131 N.J.
  5. 131 N.J. 91 (1993)
 

BERNARD v. IMI SYSTEMS, INC.

131 N.J. 91 (1993)

618 A.2d 338

ROBERT BERNARD, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. IMI SYSTEMS, INC., MARVIN GOLDBERG AND ROBERT S. FORMAN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 25, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nicholas J. Taldone argued the cause for appellants (Shanley & Fisher, attorneys).

Bruce L. Atkins argued the cause for respondent (Contant, Scherby & Atkins, attorneys; Andrew T. Fede, on the brief).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by GARIBALDI, J.

Plaintiff, Robert Bernard, alleges that he was unlawfully discharged by defendant, IMI Systems, Inc. (IMI), in violation of a written letter agreement of employment. This appeal poses questions concerning the interpretation of two provisions of that letter agreement: whether the provision "Your compensation will be at the rate of $80,000 per annum ..." creates a year-to-year contract of employment; and whether...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases